Doug's Darkworld

War, Science, and Philosophy in a Fractured World.

Colonialism’s new look for the 21st century: OLPC, One Laptop per Child

with 5 comments

Yes, there’s been breaking news on the OLPC project. Very soon US residents will be able to purchase two of the $100 laptops for only $399 (no, it’s not a new Apple product,) one for themselves and one for some fortunate child in the developing world. Orders for the laptops have been a little slower than anticipated, so this scheme was implemented to raise money for the project.

What the heck is the OLPC project? In a nutshell, it’s a plan to produce a cheap robust lap top for use under conditions where the infrastructure is less than ideal: the developing world. It has no moving parts, can be read in sunlight, and is powered by a foot pump, solar power, or a pull-string powered charger. A laptop that can be used by children in the developing world for a reasonable cost, ultimately the goal being only $100 per child. It’s also waterproof. (After seeing a friend destroy a fine laptop with a single drop of coffee, I’d think all laptops would be waterproof, but what do I know?)

OLPC, the organization developing and promoting this project is a non profit organization. An attempt to bring the modern world to children in the developing world, what could possibly be wrong with helping children?

Here’s my theory: Whenever someone says something is “for the children,” one should immediately narrow one’s eyes and focus one’s mind, because you’ve just been alerted that someone is trying to pull a fast one on you. In this case, the immediate question one should ask is, what do children in the developing world need? For starters: 1.5 million children die in the developing world every year due to lack of access to clean water and sanitation. Another 2.2 million die for want of a few dollars worth of immunizations. This is our solution, give em $100 laptops?! Think of the creative blog entries! “My little sister died today because we couldn’t afford a dollar’s worth of medicine, but thank God some rich westerner gave me this laptop so I can blog about it!”

Ah, the humanity. Yes, I am sure that many of the people behind this project are truly trying to do a good thing. I hope. I mean, superficially it does sound like a neat idea, give the poor children of the world a leg up into the information age, how can that be bad? Well, for one thing, as noted above, there are tens of millions of children in the developing world who have far more pressing needs: food, clean water, and shelter. For a second thing, libraries and schools could be built to give poor children far more effective learning resources that just a laptop…for far less money per child. Hmm, the proponents of this project don’t mention that. Thirdly, these laptops are going to be sold to the nations of the developing world…for cold hard western cash.

In other words, no matter how well intentioned some of the participants may be, this is a project primarily designed to suck $100 per child out of the poorest nations on Earth under the guise of helping them. In the old days this was called colonialism, and many people then also truly thought they were helping the poor Godless natives. Now we call it “helping the children.” Nothing has really changed since the day the Dutch “bought” Manhattan (above) for a few trunks full of trade goods, we get their resources for far less than their actual value, and the natives get beads and blankets. In a few hundred years will they add a second historical marker with a guy in a suit selling a laptop to a child?

I know, this is a very popular project that almost everyone thinks is a grand idea, but at least I’m not completely alone in my misgivings: Problems with the $100 Laptop.

(The above image of a historical marker in Manhattan is claimed as Fair Use under US copyright law. It is not being used for profit and is central to illustrating the post. Credit: this site. And no, this really wasn’t a case of the clever Dutch taking shameful advantage of the simple natives…the real story of how the Dutch got Manhattan is even less flattering.)

Written by unitedcats

September 24, 2007 at 10:55 am

Posted in Business, World

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. So you mean the Western solution to solve problems like “we” think they should be solved is wrong ?
    Para 3&4 are excellent points typical of why I enjoy visiting. Take Care

    in2thefray

    September 24, 2007 at 11:07 am

  2. I disagree with you on this one, Doug. It’s a worthy project and if you don’t want to spend your money on it, don’t.

    whig

    September 24, 2007 at 12:06 pm

  3. I want to say a bit more, that I’ve been following this OLPC project for a number of years and watched as people tried to turn it into something different than Nicholas Negroponte imagined. Microsoft wanted to be the OS, of course. Lots of money and temptation was offered, I’m sure. He saw this through to achieve his vision the way he believed it should be done. He is a true visionary, whether or not you share his vision.

    whig

    September 25, 2007 at 12:36 am

  4. I also want to tell you that as a child, I wrote LOGO programs. Spontaneously, if you like, because it was merely because the language was available and explained to me, thus I could make the turtle draw pictures. And so I did.

    whig

    September 25, 2007 at 12:40 am

  5. The 100$ laptop per child, to bad it didn’t worked as they wanted.
    But the innitiative is good! Too bad. It had potential.

    Nico Sap

    February 7, 2009 at 3:49 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: