Doug's Darkworld

War, Science, and Philosophy in a Fractured World.

Shinichi’s Tricycle

with 17 comments

Shinichi Tetsutani was a three year old boy who loved to ride his new red tricycle. 63 years ago this day he was riding his trike in his front yard. He was playing with his friend Kimiko. It was 8:15 in the morning. A quarter mile away there was a bright flash in the sky. Shin was badly burned and buried in the debris of his house. He was still alive when his parents dug him out, his hands still gripping the handlebars of his trike. They were unable to get to his two sisters in time as the wreckage of their home burned. Shin died that night. The next day his parents buried their children in their front yard, they thought they were too young to be buried in a lonely grave far from home. Shin’s friend Kimiko had also been killed in the blast, so they were buried together, holding hands. Shin’s beloved trike was buried with him.

Shin’s parents lived on in their rebuilt home for decades, knowing their children were nearby was of some solace. Then in the eighties they decided to dig them up and bury them in a proper grave. They had forgotten about the trike, and were surprised when they found it. Their children were re-buried, the trike went to the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum, where it is on permanent display. A museum devoted to peace, and the memories of the more than two hundred thousand people who died in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945.

The atomic bombings are easily among the worst war crimes in history, and like all great crimes, they are surrounded by a wall of lies. If the Japanese had gotten the bomb and used it on San Francisco, the perpetrators of the act would have been hung as war criminals, their barbaric crime elaborated in every textbook in America for all eternity. Because of lies, and let’s face it, racism, these crimes are little known in the USA, and for the most part cared about even less. In most American’s minds killing white civilians is an atrocity, killing brown and yellow civilians is payback.

The first lie is that the atomic bombings “saved American lives.” A figure of half a million dead GIs who would have died in the invasion of Japan is routinely bandied about as if it was fact. The absurdity of this number cannot be overstated. The Japanese navy, army, air force, factories, and cities had been utterly destroyed by four years of warfare. Japan was, literally, defenceless. Yet we are to believe that the invasion of Japan would have resulted in twice as many Americans dead than had died in the entire war? It’s beyond ludicrous: the official army estimates for casualties in the invasion of Japan was 46,000. Then of course the perverted idea that it’s OK to slaughter woman and children to save the lives of soldiers, an idea worthy of Osama Bin Laden, is simply glossed over and ignored. If Japanese soldiers had killed American women and children to save the lives of their soldiers, how many Americans would regard their actions as justified?

Another layer of the lies is that the atomic bombings were necessary to end the war. No, they weren’t. The war was over, Japan had been trying to surrender for a year. The only thing that kept the war going was American politician’s insistence that the Japanese surrender unconditionally. No conquerer in history has ever insisted on an enemy’s unconditional surrender, to do so would force them to fight to the last man, what is the point of that? Every person who died in the last year of the War in the Pacific died because of Truman’s arrogance and pride, and the pride of other politicians surrounding him. It’s really even worse than that, since the Japanese were defeated, their homeland starving, they would have surrendered eventually without either nuclear bombing or an invasion. The unthinkable is retroactively justified by simply ignoring inconvenient alternatives.

And it was Truman and company. To our military leader’s credit, they were appalled by the decision to use the bomb and argued against it. Including Eisenhower and MacArthur. The idea that the bombing was a military “necessity” is kind of hard to support when the military itself argued otherwise. That’s modern America though, a land where the “history” our children are taught is so fraught with lies and omissions that it would make Goebbels proud. One could even make the case that this “history” is part and parcel of why even today the death of innocent brown people in foreign lands at our military’s hands barely registers on the national consciousness, and even when it does is considered justified by many.

Am I trying to make some case against America and its people? No. I am trying to point out that warriors deliberately killing little children is always wrong, no matter who the soldiers are, no matter what the war, no matter what the context, no matter what anyone says. Killing children is a crime, not an act of war. Anyone who says differently is at best misinformed. At best.

God rest their little souls. God grant us the wisdom to never do this again. God help us all through the dark days ahead.

(The above images are claimed as Fair Use under US copyright law. And in any event, I’m pretty sure the copyright holder’s won’t object to my use of them here.)

Written by unitedcats

August 6, 2008 at 9:17 am

Posted in History, Peace, Politics, War, World

17 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Very well worded. Moving post.
    Thanks for this one.

    Andrew

    August 6, 2008 at 8:44 pm

  2. Great post, Doug.

    Lister

    August 7, 2008 at 6:39 am

  3. I believe this is the 63rd anniversary.

    Thanks for the reminder of this horrible event.

    Patrick

    August 7, 2008 at 9:31 am

  4. “Then of course the perverted idea that it’s OK to slaughter woman and children to save the lives of soldiers, an idea worthy of Osama Bin Laden, is simply glossed over and ignored.”

    It’s also worthy of George Bush and the current American military operating in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Ric

    August 7, 2008 at 3:19 pm

  5. Good post. Well done.

    Ric

    August 7, 2008 at 3:20 pm

  6. Also it should be remembered that many of the bombs creators were against its use.

    War is hell, lets all try our best to avoid it.

    For that matter, why do we allow politicians to fight them without declaring them?

    Bush’s legacy will be more noted for his policies resulting in the economic collapse of America. ‘Bushvilles’ will replace Hoovervilles in the American lexicon.

    And Cheney? He does deserve a statue and his famous remark “deficits don’t matter” mounted on a plaque on its base.

    ET

    August 7, 2008 at 6:47 pm

  7. […] Shinichi’s Tricycle […]

  8. “In most American’s minds killing white civilians is an atrocity, killing brown and yellow civilians is payback.”

    I hope this isn’t true. It sounds more like the Bush administration than the majority Americans.

    PiedType

    August 12, 2008 at 8:48 pm

  9. In polls 2/3rds of Americans will say that the atomic bombings were “unavoidable.” How much of that is attributable to propaganda and how much to racism is debatable, but there are large segments of American society (whole states even) where racism is implicit even of rarely expressed openly. In my own experience I used to play a game, I would try to get men I met to agree with me that “those nips deserved the bombs.” You would be horrified how many enthusiastically agreed, I stopped playing the game because it was so depressing how easy it was. I will agree that the great majority of Americans are basically good people, and with honourable leadership will not countenance bad things. So basically we agree. :)

    unitedcats

    August 12, 2008 at 9:02 pm

  10. Excellent post – Kurt Vonnegut said our willingness to tolerate war was a failure of the imagination. We think in terms of wars against governments rather than the tragedies of individuals. Thanks for telling a much-needed story.

    Monte

    August 13, 2008 at 8:44 pm

  11. […] clipped from unitedcats.wordpress.com […]

  12. the great majority of Americans are basically good people, and with honourable leadership will not countenance bad things.

    But with dishonorable leadership, which we have had for the last eight years, Americans do countenance bad things. That hardly makes them ‘basically good people’. That tends to make them more a herd of sheep playing follow the leader because they haven’t the courage to think for themselves.

    Ric

    August 17, 2008 at 7:01 am

  13. Right. And there’s something powerful about propaganda – many I know really do believe that since national leaders have access to better information than ordinary people, they (my friends) would be presumptuous to say that what national leaders do is wrong.
    Somehow many have become convinced that being sheep is the only possible course.
    I can’t help but believe that to be an intentional message sent by powerful people to convince us that what they do is truly in our best interest.
    I remember Nixon’s “secret plan to end the war.”

    Monte

    August 18, 2008 at 10:18 pm

  14. The sheep are sick and tired of their self-serving shepherds in Washington. Stay tuned …

    PiedType

    August 19, 2008 at 3:34 pm

  15. Thanks for the post, Doug… it’s a heartbreaking topic and should never be forgotten or glossed over. I completely agree with you.

    Amber Kerr

    August 29, 2008 at 2:46 pm

  16. Excellent post. It is very heart moving. Thanks for sharing with us.

  17. Enjoyed re-reading this. Well written post.

    A.

    August 9, 2013 at 10:06 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: