Doug's Darkworld

War, Science, and Philosophy in a Fractured World.

The Axis of Evil: The CMBR Dipole Anisotropy

with 16 comments

cmbr_dipole

In my search for paranormal mysteries to write about, I came across some intriguing scientific mysteries. Cool. One of my thoughts in old age is that real scientific mysteries are vastly more cool than basically made up things like UFOs and the Bermuda Triangle. I mean, scientific mysteries are real, not a conglomeration of anecdotes, amateur research,  and wishful thinking. Yes, I’m really starting to develop  disdain for people who can’t or won’t grasp that science is backed up by vast amounts of empirical data and very solid research by hundreds of thousands of really smart scientists over centuries of time. In their rush to dismiss the judgement of science, critics of science often demonstrate a profound ignorance of both science and historical fact. And by doing so, pass up opportunities to actually question scientific theory. So so many people refuse to accept the Big Bang theory, yet none have even bothered to study the theory in enough depth to actually understand its weak points. And the CMBR dipole anisotropy is a weak point in our scientific understanding of the Universe, no doubt about it.

So what the hell is the CMBR dipole anisotropy? I’ve helpfully illustrated it above, all clear now? OK, it took me awhile to understand this picture, so here goes. The CMBR is the cosmic microwave background radiation, basically the afterglow from the Big Bang and the early days of the Universe. Well, like every other “thing” in the universe, the CMBR is red shifted or blue shifted depending on whether we are travelling toward or away from it. And lo and behold, it turns out that we are moving relative to the CMBR at about 600 kps. Um, this is really fast. It in fact dwarfs the other motions the Earth is doing: orbiting the Sun, our galaxy’s spin, etc. IE the image above is a picture of the sky, and the blue parts of the universe are moving toward us and the red parts are moving away. So in relationship to the original Universe, the Earth, and presumably all nearby stars and galaxies, are moving at an incredible rate of speed. (For my American readers, 600 kps is about 375 miles per second or over 1,000,000 mph.)

Cool, eh? Um, no. There really isn’t any good way as of yet to explain why we should be moving so fast in reference to the CMBR. In fact this little problem is so vexing that some cosmologists have dubbed the CMBR dipole anisotropy the “Axis of Evil.” For awhile many cosmologists did the thing scientists often do when they get results that threaten to overturn existing theory, especially a theory that has some solid experimental validation. They hoped that subsequent studies and observations would correct the discrepancy somehow.

For example, in the 90s with the Pleiades mystery. The Pleiades is a constellation and an actual cluster of stars near the Earth (comparatively speaking.) It’s close enough to Earth that its distance from Earth can be calculated fairly easily and accurately. And since the Pleiades  is a bunch of stars, we can get pretty good average values of how bright certain types of stars are. And since we know how far away the Pleiades are, we can use these values to calculate how far away other similar stars are that are too far away from Earth to directly measure their distance from us. So in a very real sense, the distance to the Pleiades is the “yardstick” used to calculate how far away every other object in the visible Universe is. Well, in the 80s they launched a satellite, the Hipparcos mission, that was to measure the distance to the Pleiades even more accurately than could be done from Earth, thus allowing scientists to more accurately gauge how far away everything else in the Universe was.

To astronomer’s surprise, the data from Hipparcos showed that the Pleiades was about ten percent closer than all other measurements showed. This was a huge difference, and a huge problem. This meant that pretty much every calculated distance to astronomical objects was vastly in error, which caused problems for all sorts of astronomical and cosmological theories. Astronomers began to frantically recalculate astronomical distances calculated from Earth to see if there was some sort of problem somewhere, and the Hipparcos team went over their data with a fine tooth comb. Fortunately after much head scratching it was determined that the Hipparcos team had overlooked a rather obvious in retrospect error in how the satellite was programmed to measure distances. Phew.

However, right now it’s not looking as promising for the CMBR dipole anisotropy, several studies seem to confirm that it is a real observation. And no one has come up with any explanation for it. Granted it’s not making much news, but when it comes right down to it, very little that goes on in the scientific world makes the news much. And when we come to stuff as arcane and hard to explain as cosmologyy and the CMBR dipole anisotropy, well, even I hesitated to write about it.

In fact in some ways the main reason I wrote about it was to point out that no one was writing about it. Especially layman critics of the Big Bang theory, mostly the religiously inspired. I mean, here’s some real strong ammo to use to discredit the Big Bang theory, and yet none of the critics is apparently even aware of it? Which illustrates that most critics of standard accepted theories are coming from an ideological point rather than logical one. You’d think that if one was going to debate a point, one would at least familiarize themself with the topic. For example I was arguing with a person who thinks the Moon landings were a hoax, and I pointed out that the Russians had compared our Moon rocks with their Moon rocks and concluded they were genuine. My opponent had a conniption de merde and claimed that since the Russians hadn’t gone to the Moon, they could not possibly have Moon rocks to compare to the rocks brought back by the Apollo Missions. Apparently he was unaware, as are most people, that three Russian robotic missions to the Moon in the seventies did indeed carry back Moon rock samples to Russia.

I mean, I can understand why most people aren’t aware of the Russian sample return missions to the Moon, but if you’re going to argue that the Apollo Missions were hoaxed and the Moon rocks were faked, shouldn’t you do at least some rudimentary research into your topic? It’s becoming clearer and clearer to me that most people believe what they want to believe, without ever actually taking the time to investigate the factual basis of their beliefs. So moving right along, I’ll continue to follow the CMBR dipole anisotropy story and post a follow-up when there are any new developments. And if I have made any factual errors above, please point them out to me, since I at least believe I want to learn the facts about what I believe. Gotta start somewhere.

(The above image is produced mostly by NASA and other government funded research, and I’m reasonably sure it’s public domain under US copyright law. I got it from this site, credit: DMR, COBE, NASA, Four-Year Sky Map. The first Russian Luna probe that returned samples from the Moon was actually pretty cool, as evidenced by the fine array of products available to commemorate it. In fact, I know now that my life is incomplete and will remain incomplete until I have  a Luna-16 coffee mug.)

Written by unitedcats

September 10, 2009 at 8:28 am

16 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. “It’s becoming clearer and clearer to me that most people believe what they want to believe, without ever actually taking the time to investigate the factual basis of their beliefs.”

    I could not agree more!! This statement is appropriate to so many subjects, religion, politics, SCIENCE, 9-11….

    “A little learning is a dangerous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.”

    -Alexander Pope’s poem “Essay on Criticism”

    Good post, I was kinda getting burned out on politics…..for now….

    Peace
    Conrad

    Pyrodin123321

    September 10, 2009 at 12:53 pm

  2. The image resembles a yinyang.

    Mike Goldman

    September 10, 2009 at 7:41 pm

  3. interesting post, didn’t know anything about CMBR, nice to learn something new. I too am thankfull for the break from politics.

    Josh V.

    September 11, 2009 at 10:08 am

  4. Love this post!

    Brother...

    September 13, 2009 at 12:31 am

  5. It’s not clear from your post, but isn’t CMBR everywhere in the universe? If that’s so, the idea of moving toward or away from it doesn’t make sense. Obviously I’m missing something here. Can you clear up this point?

    Ric

    September 13, 2009 at 7:57 am

  6. Well, the CMBR is the farthest back in time we can currently see, and yes, we see it in every direction. And yes, it permeates the universe so it should be the same in every direction … but it’s not. So you’ve hit the nail on the head, the idea that we are moving at a fantastic speed compared to the CMBR doesn’t make sense! It doesn’t make sense at all! That’s why it’s a been dubbed “The Axis of Evil” because this was an experimental result that flies in the face of what was expected.

    I wish I could “clear up this point.” There may be a Nobel Prize in it for the person who does. I appreciate your confidence in me though, but I suspect it’s going to take a much greater mind than mine to figure this one out.
    — Doug

    unitedcats

    September 13, 2009 at 8:05 am

  7. Okay, how about this? If CMBR is the same everywhere, could our movement be analogous to a swimmer in a pool? He condenses the water ahead of him (blue shift) and thins (red shift) the water behind him? Assuming a static or semi-static CMBR.

    Ric

    September 13, 2009 at 8:12 am

  8. We’re moving at light speed, Doug!

    Look into Nassim Haramein’s grand unification.

    Mike Goldman

    October 2, 2009 at 6:32 pm

  9. […] one of the most inexplicable discoveries in astronomy ever.  More perplexing than even the CMBR Dipole Anisotropy. What the hell is “dark flow?” It’s not easy to explain, but explaining things is […]

  10. […] topics before, or at least the basics of them by discussing the Big Bang theory, Strange Lodgings, The Axis of Evil, and Dark Flow. And now that everyone understands the Big Bang theory … they can explain it […]

  11. […] open for more cosmic mysteries. There’s a fair number of them actually, I also covered the Axis of Evil and Dark Flow as well. And there’s many more to be found no doubt. The Universe is a big […]

  12. It looks like the context of the CMBR is spinning. We’re moving away from one side and moving toward the other. That describes a spin, right?

    Researcher

    January 12, 2011 at 5:40 am

  13. look at the purposeful universe by Carl Calleman. it looks at a possible explanation for the axis of evil.
    it is quite an elegant theory.

    cobie

    January 31, 2011 at 12:12 am

  14. It looks like the daoist yin/yang vortex down to the last detail of the seed of each within the other!

    doctorglen

    July 21, 2013 at 4:53 pm

  15. We are going to cover this amazing find on an upcoming broadcast of Real Science Radio (www.rsr.org). Yet another in a long line of vastly overwhelming evidence that God exists.

    Fred Williams

    September 11, 2013 at 9:05 pm

  16. Just FYI creationists brought this up in 2006 http://creation.mobi/cmb-conundrums

    Dave

    March 27, 2014 at 9:53 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: