Doug's Darkworld

War, Science, and Philosophy in a Fractured World.

A Hard Act to Follow

with 12 comments

Well, my last post has turned out to be my most successful post ever, more than 40,000 hits so far. So now what do I do? Rest on my laurels? Sounds painful, don’t laurels have thorns? It’s especially curious in that it wasn’t a particularly well thought out or researched post, it was just something I knocked off in an hour or two. In any event I’ve sat around too much as it is lately, how about I write on my laurels?

While I am aware that my observations yesterday weren’t terribly scientific, the post certainly generated a lot of comments. I guess what most gets me about the propagation of incorrect tidbits like the five weekends in October, is the general level of uncritical acceptance people seem to be showing more than a decade after the Internet became widespread. I breathlessly passed on the first one or two Internet hoaxes I received back in the early nineties, and after feeling very stupid changed my ways and became very skeptical of tidbits people were passing along, especially if it was something “cool” that one would be inclined to pass along. It’s easy to spot an Internet hoax, they almost always come with instructions asking the reader to forward them.

And since then I’ve become even more critical and sceptical about new information I receive on line. Granted I can’t research every single fact I present, but I think I do a pretty good job. What errors people have called me on have usually been minor or simply careless mistakes that slipped through my drafts. I’ve also tried to fix old misconceptions or errors I learnt before the Internet even existed. If some fact I am about to quote is something I learnt decades ago, or is some turn of phrase I’ve used all my life, I often do some quick research before tossing it out there. And boy, I’ve learnt some bloopers in my time.

For example for years I thought “su madre” meant “right away, boss.” OK, that’s a joke. I did for example completely misunderstand the meaning of “Cherchez la femme,” I thought the USA never lost a battle in Vietnam, and I thought Israel had the world’s fourth largest military. Wrong, wrong, wrong. The USA most certainly did lose some battles in Vietnam, although not any major ones (unless you count losing the war.) Israel’s military is definitely not the world’s fourth largest, although they are still an awesome military power that has no serious rivals in the Middle East. And I’m not even going to say what I thought “Cherchez la femme” meant, other than to say I now know why people looked amused or puzzled when I’ve used the phrase in the past.

I don’t think the Internet is making people stupid, though it may be changing the way that use it heavily think. That’s not saying much though, any new activity, especially one that uses the brain, is going to change the brain of the people who take it up. FYI the old theory about how the human brain can’t grow new connections after a certain age has been shown to be completely false, as false as the old idea people couldn’t grow new muscle mass after age forty or so.  Since I plan to use my muscles and brain for at least another forty years, this is a good thing.

No, the Internet isn’t making people into idiots, but I don’t think it’s helping. Granted other things have been going on as well, changes in the mass media and our “educational” (formerly educational) system also seem to be having a rather negative effect on the typical person’s world view. So it would be hard to parse out exactly what the Internet is doing. I’m just appalled that the ability to quickly and simply fact check what people see on the Internet or the news or whatever  … seems to have had no appreciable effect on the mass gullibility index. And I wonder if that’s by accident or design.

Moving right along, I mostly wrote this follow-up post to thank people for the thoughtful comments they left on the previous post. Even the snarky ones, and I didn’t vote for Nixon by the way. I don’t claim to be a purveyor of the truth, but I do my best to avoid spreading falsehoods. The main purpose of Doug’s Darkworld is to entertain, educate, and stimulate thought. In both the reader … and in me. And the comments on the prior post have given me a lot to think about. Thanks everyone.

(The above image is claimed as Fair Use under US copyright law. It’s not being used for profit and its use here in no conceivable way interferes with the copyright holder’s commercial use of the image. I believe it was originally an advertisement for Riksgalden Lottery Bonds. This a a bond where one doesn’t receive interest, instead one has a chance at winning a lottery. A concept that sums up nicely the madness of the modern financial industry and modern society, basically people are being tricked into loaning the Swedish government money at no interest if I understand this correctly. Banks used to give away toasters, now they give away lottery tickets. Ah, progress.)

 

 

Written by unitedcats

October 6, 2010 at 7:18 am

Posted in Philosophy, Propaganda, Science

Tagged with

12 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. sceptical???

    skeptical!!!

    l. Koss

    October 8, 2010 at 10:40 am

    • Good catch, my Canadian spell-checker choked on that one. Skeptic is the proper Canadian spelling, sceptic is British. Thanks. —Doug

      unitedcats

      October 8, 2010 at 11:15 am

  2. This was great!! I feel exactly the same about passing on false information. I forwarded your first post to the people that sent me the October email. Very well said! Great job!

    Tina Webb

    October 14, 2010 at 7:14 am

  3. the UK government has been issuing ‘premium bonds’ which sounds like the same deal as the swedish bonds since 1956. does that still count as modern ?

    Jon Allen

    October 17, 2010 at 3:35 am

  4. You are absolutely right. I want the iPhone just so I can pull it out of my pocket, google wikipedia about the current topic (conversation). Just because the computer is smaller doesn’t mean you are not addicted to it.

    Peter

    October 18, 2010 at 8:32 am

    • be careful with Wikipedia as a source for fact. Sure it’s fun to peruse, but anyone can set up an account to list and change “facts”. ;)

      Rae

      October 24, 2010 at 6:35 pm

  5. the article about friday, sat., sun. occuring five time in one month only once in 823 years is a joke.
    it just occurred in januare 2010.

    larry mcmanus

    October 18, 2010 at 12:36 pm

  6. Thanks so much for your veery fine posts about the October weekends and your generally thoughtful and perspicacious comments of the Internet in general and learning in particular.

    You might please the grammar cop in me by correcting the second (and, alas, incorrect) use of it’s. “It’s not being used for profit and it’s use here…” The second usage should be its, the possessive, not it’s, the contraction of it is.

    Deborah

    October 25, 2010 at 11:47 am

    • Oh yeah, my grammar may not be perfect, but that was just something I missed in review. Some posts I have time to do serious error and grammar checking, some not as much. Always happy to have mistakes pointed out. Thanks for visiting. — Doug

      unitedcats

      October 25, 2010 at 12:28 pm

  7. […] Postscript: This post is so far my most visited post ever, so I wrote a follow-up post. […]

  8. Psst … banks still give away toasters and I have a new one to prove it.

    PiedType

    November 7, 2010 at 8:35 pm

  9. Did you ever hear of just having fun? I realize the months that I end up with five paydays and I know it’s more than every 823 years. Loser! Get A Life!

    may

    September 25, 2011 at 2:15 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: